Provisions on Pension Disparity passed in the Finance Bill – Outcomes of the NC JCM Meeting with Secretary (Pension) held on 29/03/2025

HomePensionJCM

Provisions on Pension Disparity passed in the Finance Bill – Outcomes of the NC JCM Meeting with Secretary (Pension) held on 29/03/2025

Provisions on Pension Disparity passed in the Finance Bill by the Parliament – Outcomes of the NC JCM Meeting with Secretary (Pension) held on 29/03/2025 through Video Conference by NC (Staff Side), JCM writes to Staff Side Members dated 29.03.2025.  On March 29, 2025, a video conference was held between the Staff Side of the National Council Joint Consultative Machinery (NC JCM) and the Secretary (Pension) regarding pension disparities introduced in the Finance Bill. The Government’s move to distinguish pensioners based on retirement dates raised concerns about violating the parity established by the 7th Central Pay Commission (CPC) and created apprehensions among pensioners ahead of the expected 8th CPC recommendations. The Secretary assured that existing parity would be maintained, and the government would clarify its stance to alleviate fears among pensioners.

Shiva Gopal Mishra
Secretary

Ph.: 23382286
National Council (Staff Side)
Joint Consultative Machinery
13-C, Ferozshah Road, New Delhi – 110001
E-Mail : nc.jcm.np[at]gmail.com

No.NC-JCM-2025/Pension

March 29, 2025

To

All the Staff Side Members of National Council JCM

Sub: Brief on the Meeting held with Secretary (Pension) DOP&PW on 29/03/2025 through Video Conference on the provisions on Pension Disparity passed in the Finance Bill by the Parliament — Reg.,

Dear Comrades,

The Government of India while moving the Finance Bill for the approval of Parliament has included a chapter for “Validation of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules and Principles for expenditure on pension liabilities from the Consolidated Fund of India”. Through this the Government has got authority to establish distinctions among pensioners which may emanate from the accepted recommendations of the Central Pay Commissions, and in particular a distinction may be made on the basis of the date of retirement of a pensioner or the date of operationalisation of an accepted recommendation of a Central Pay commission.

After the passage of the Finance Bill in the Parliament, there was opposition inside the parliament and outside by the Staff Side of the NC JCM and also by the various Pensioners Associations, since it takes away the parity in pension recommended by the 7th CPC and implemented by the Government of India. Moreover since the 8th CPC has also been announced Pensioners all over the country were concerned about their pension revision and also for maintaining the parity between the pensioners who retired prior to 01/01/2026 and those who will be retiring after 01/01/2026 (expected date of recommendations of 8th CPC). In this situation Secretary (Pension), DOP&PW convened a meeting with the Staff Side Members of the Standing Committee of National Council JCM and also with few pensioners associations through Video Conference today.

The Staff Side was represented in the meeting by the following Comrades:

1. Shiva Gopal Mishra
2. Guman Singh
3. C Srikumar
4. Bhosle
5. Shankar Rao
6. Roopak Sarkar

We protested and opposed the move of the Government for taking the authority through Parliament for establishing disparity among pensioners, as such discrimination amongst the pensioners is a clear violation of the Supreme Court Judgment and also a threat on the recommendations of the 7th CPC which was accepted by the Government for maintaining parity between pensioners who retired prior to 01/01/2016 and after 01/01/2016. Government having announced the 8th CPC and the present decision has come as a big blow on the pensioners and hence this needs to be reconsidered and withdrawn by the Government. Our views were supported by Pensioners Associations also.

Responding to the views expressed by the Staff Side Members and the representatives of the Pensioners Associations, Secretary (Pension) clarified the following:

1. Since the 5th and 6th CPC has maintained disparity between Pensioners who retired before and after 1st January 1996 and before and after 1st January 2006 respectively which the Government also agreed and implemented those recommendations. However Government was not having any authority in the Pension Rules for providing such distinction according to the Supreme Court and hence Government for having that authority the provisions have been incorporated in the CCS (Pension) Rules.

2. The apprehension that the parity between pensioners given by the 7th CPC and implemented by the Government will be taken away is not correct since it is already there and the same will continue to be there with the 8th CPC also and hence there is nothing to worry and Government is committed towards the welfare of the pensioners.

In view of the above clarification given by the Secretary (Pension) we demanded that to remove the fear and apprehensions in the mind of pensioners, Government should issue a clarification in this regard and the same should be included in the Terms of Reference of the 8th CPC as already demanded by the Staff Side. Secretary (Pension) assured that a clarification will be issued in this regard. On a query about restoration of commuted portion of pension after 12 years, he informed that it has been decided to refer the matter to 8th CPC.

We will be updating you about further developments in this regard.

Yours fraternally,

(Shiva Gopal Mishra)
Secretary

View/Download the PDF

COMMENTS

WORDPRESS: 4
  • P.L. GUPTA ,Secretary General, HPSEB,PWA, State Body. 3 hours ago

    As I understand that earlier always there had been separate notifications of the pre-revision and post revision pension. In the 7th pay commission, the revision of pension of pre-01-01-2016 was notified on 4th August,2016 by applying 2.57 factor on the existing pension as per 2nd formula for revision of pension and final notification was issued on 12-05-2017, as per the approval of the Central Cabinet. It was stated the in respect of pensioners who retired/ died prior to 01-01-2016 may be revised by notionally fixing their pay in the pay matrix recommended by the 7th CPC in the level corresponding to the pay scale/pay band and grade pay at which they retired/died. While fixing pay on notional basis, the pay fixation formulae approved by the Govt. and other relevant instructions on the subject in force at relevant time shall be followed notionally fixed from 1984 on the basis of of the revision of pay scales in the intervening period. And after arriving at the notional pay as on 01-01-2016, Therefore, I hope that the concern shown in the pre loaded comments will be addressed by the commission appointed for the purpose. I may tell that I had suggested to the 7th CPC that the revision of pension of pre-revision pensioner should be done on notionally fixing the pay and on notional pay arrived at the, the pension should be fixed/revised. I feel proud that CPC agreed and suggestion was incorporated in the recommendation and accepted/approved as formula 1st in the central cabinet, for that a high level committee was constituted, finally in the 7th meeting it was approved and the notification dated 1-05-2017 referred to above was issued. I am confident that the formula of notional fixation adopted in 7th CPC will will follow suit.

  • ANANDARAMAN 1 day ago

    PARLIAMENT BY HER SPEECH GIVES GREAT DOUBT. WHY SUCH BILL IMMEDIATELY DESIRED? SHE SAYS VALIDATION. WHY SHOUD SHE SAY ARMED FORCES PENSION ARE GOVERNED BY DIFFERENT SET OF RULES? DOES IT MEAN ARMED FORCES PENSIONERS EXISTING PENSIONERS IN UNTIL 2025 YEARS NOT RELAVANT 8CPC BUT APPLICABLE UNDER 2029 OROP 4 REVISION. GOVT DESIRES TO BEFOOL RETIREES WHETHER IN ARMED FORCE OR IN CIVIL.

  • AMOL V SULE 1 day ago

    NATIONAL FEDERATION OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT & ALLIED EMPLOYEES & WORKERS ORGANISATIONS (NFCGA-EWO)
    (An Organisation of the Organisations of Central Government, Allied Departments, Casual, Contingent, Outsourced & Contract Employees & Workers)
    Headquarters: New Delhi
    Email: – nfcgeaeo[at]gmail.com
    Central Office: Address for communication:
    B-32, Udyog Bhawan, House No. H-3/108, TF (FS), Bengali Colony,
    New Delhi- 110011 Mahavir Enclave Part-I, New Delhi -110001
    Ghanshyam Chauhan V. Bhattacharjee
    President Secretary General
    Mob. 9891968372 Mob.9868520926

    ON DISCRIMINATION TO PENSIONERS
    The amendments introduced by the Government through the Finance Bill for retrospectively revising the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 have been passed in the Lok Sabha on 25.03.2025 in spite of opposition and protests. The opposition staged a walkout, objecting to the move to amend the rules. Irrespective of the fact that the Rajya Sabha also passes the Bill, the changes in the Pension Rules will be final and come into effect.
    Amendments to the Pension Rules envisage that the benefits of revision of pension by the future Pay commissions will be given only to those pensioners retiring after the implementation of these rules. The date of retirement will determine eligibility for the benefit under the said rules. According to media reports, the amendments in the rules clarify that the pensioners retiring before the recommendations of the Central Pay Commission will no longer be eligible for the revised benefits. Only those retiring after the report of the Pay Commission will receive the revised benefits. The Government will now have the authority to determine when to implement the recommendations of the Pay Commission for the pensioners.
    In fact, the amendment to the Pension Rules excludes the existing pensioners from the purview of the 8th Central Pay Commission altogether.
    Needless to state that all existing pensioners/family pensioners and their families have been traumatized by the above decision of the Government as they have been scheduled to be pushed to half starved condition at the fag end of their life. The existing pensioners or the family pensioners despite rendering tireless and dedicated service to the Nation with total devotion for 35-40 years of their life are being pushed to larches.
    Pensioners are already the worst hit as they do not even receive half of the last pay they had been getting and hence surviving with continuous struggle against the increase in the life expenses with the passage of time. While the pensioners/ family pensioners and particularly those pensioners who retired from service from comparatively lower level posts are already surviving with a hand to mouth condition with a paltry sum of pension they are receiving shall now be in the conditions of total financial disaster and denial of “right to live” with this decisions of the Government to stall the process of enhancement of the pension to the level of survival amount with reference to inflation in the market price as the pay commissions are the master instruments for the Government/employer through which minimum living wage is devised .
    The Government should have considered the facts before amending the said rules that the quantum of pension amount does not increase with any allowance or annual increments etc. Amenities like rent free accommodation, LTC or subsidy in the form of concession from Railways and Bonus etc which are available for the serving employees do not apply to pensioners. Instead the pensioners are equally sharing the burden of Nation Building along with the rest of the citizens of the country by paying Income Tax against their pension as per the prevailing law/rules. They are also equally contributing to the economy of the country by paying various direct and indirect taxes, GST and all other forms of taxes in force. There is no exemption for pensioners to the cost of medicines which are half of the diet for the elderly and the costs of which have become fourfold higher in the last one and half decades.
    On the basis of the observations given by the IV CPC, the Government had taken the conscious decision of revising the pension of old pensioners and the future pensioners on the basis of the fitment formula prescribed by the IVth CPC. The 5th and 6th Pay Commissions have specifically recommended the necessity to achieve parity between the post and future pensioners. The recommendations of the 6th Central Pay Commission to maintain the modified parity between the present and the future retirees to be given the same benefits was accepted by the Government and implemented. Similarly the 7th Central Pay Commission also recommended parity between those pensioners who retired prior to 01-01-2016 and those who retired after 01-01-2016, even though full parity was not extended and it was the pending demand of the pensioners. The issue was resolved to a larger extent by the government through the orders dated 12th May 2017 issued under the recommendation of the Committee headed by the Secretary, Department of Pension & Pensioners’ Welfare.
    In addition to the above, the Hon’ble Supreme Court in its judgment in the Civil Appeal No.10857 of 2016 has specifically ruled that there is no valid justification to create 2 classes of pensioner’s viz. one who retired prior to 1996 and another who retired post 1996 for the purpose of revised pension. Such classification has no nexus with the object and purpose of grant of revised pension. All Pensioners form a one class who are entitled to pension as per pension rules. Article 14 of the Constitution of India ensures equality before law and equal protection of laws. A valid classification is truly a valid discrimination. Therefore whenever a cut-off date (as in the present controversy) is fixed to categorise one set of pensioners for favourable consideration over others, the twin test for valid classification or valid discrimination therefore must necessarily be satisfied . The Supreme Court also observed that the object and purpose for revising the pension is due to the increase in the cost of living. All the pensioners form a single class and therefore such a classification for the purpose of grant of revised pension is unreasonable , arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
    In its reply in LOK SABHA to the STARRED QUESTION No. *235, the Government has informed that the approximate number of Central Government civilian employees and pensioners/family pensioners is 36.57 lakh (as on 01.03.2025) and 33.91 lakh (as on 31 .12.2024) respectively. It is further replied that Defence Personnel and Pensioners will also be benefitted by the implementation of the report of the 8th Central Pay Commission.
    This federation hopes that the government would kindly reconsider its stand and shall act as per the reply given to the Parliament Question.
    This federation also hopes that all the pensioners and their organizations shall unite and stand as one cutting across their political and personal differences with one another and shall move together to protect the interests of the pensioners .
    This federation being one of the major representatives of the Central Government and allied services employees shall strive its best for unity and struggle for the purpose unlike few who have jumped on the path of retaliation without exploring the possibility of negotiations and dialogue with our own Government machinery with full faith in the Constitutional safeguards available in democratic framework.
    (Ghanshyam Chauhan) (V. Bhattacharjee)
    President Secretary General &
    Ex member, JCM (NC)

  • Balachandran Nair P K 2 days ago

    Thanks that there is no decision to stop pension. If so central govt pensioners be supplied with bowel to beg before the rich people like Ambani , Adani to find medicine and meals when they ashamed to tell that once upon a time i was a central govt employee and now aged above 80 and to beg

    Once a person is given state ministers status by government his honesty towards the staff will be minimal. It is about Sri Siva gopal mishra.