Regulation of Pay on Reduction of lower stage in time-scale of pay in 7th CPC Pay Matrix: Examples & Illustrations
Example: 2
[Annexure to DoPT OM No.11012/15/2016-Estt A-III dated 18-06-2019 Subject: Regulation of pay on imposition of a penatty under CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965]
ILLUSTRATIONS
Reduction to lower stage in the time-scale of Pay
Example
Level | Cell | Pay | |
On the date of Penalty |
9 | 7 | Rs. 63300 |
Reduction by 1 Stage |
9 | 6 | Rs. 61500 |
Reduction by 2 Stage |
9 | 5 | Rs. 59700 |
Reduction by 3 stage |
9 | 4 | Rs. 58000 |
Reduction by 4 stage |
9 | 3 | Rs. 56300 |
Reduction by 5 stage |
9 | 2 | Rs. 54700 |
Example: 2
Level | Cell | Pay | |
On the date of Penalty |
9 | 7 | Rs. 56300 |
Reduction by 1 Stage |
9 | 6 | Rs. 54700 |
Reduction by 2 Stage |
9 | 5 | Rs. 53100 |
Reduction by 3 stage |
** | ** | ** |
Reduction by 4 stage |
|||
Reduction by 5 stage |
** In the above illustration, a penalty of reduction by more than two stages
would fall below the first cell of the same Level, such a penalty therefore,
would not be implementable. Therefore, while imposing the penalty of reduction
to a lower stage in time-scale of pay under Rule 11 (v) of the CCS
(CCA) Rules, 1965, Disciplinary Authority may weigh all factors before
deciding upon the quantum of penalty, i.e. the number of stages by which the
pay is to be reduced.
would fall below the first cell of the same Level, such a penalty therefore,
would not be implementable. Therefore, while imposing the penalty of reduction
to a lower stage in time-scale of pay under Rule 11 (v) of the CCS
(CCA) Rules, 1965, Disciplinary Authority may weigh all factors before
deciding upon the quantum of penalty, i.e. the number of stages by which the
pay is to be reduced.
COMMENTS