7th Pay Commission: NJCA Secretary writes to Cabinet for Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme
Shiva Gopal Misra
Secretary
National Council (Staff Side)
Joint Consultative Machinery
For Central Government Employees
No.NC/JCM/7th CPC/2016
Dated: 28th July 2016
The Cabinet Secretary,
Government of India,
Rashtrapati Bhawan Annexie,
New Delhi
Respected Sir,
We wish to draw your kind attention towards the decision taken by the government on the recommendations of the 7th Central Pay Commission, especially with regard to Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS).
The government has accepted one of the adverse recommendations of the 7th CPC without holding any consultation with the Staff Side. The recommendation of the 7th CPC regarding benchmark for performance appraisal for promotion and financial upgradation under MACPS, to be enhanced from “Good” to “Very Good”, has been accepted by the government without considering its implication on the morale of the Central Government Employees. Similarly, another adverse recommendation of the 7th CPC for withholding of Annual Increment in the case of those employees who are not able to meet the benchmark, either for MACP or a regular promotion within the first 20 years
of their service has also been accepted by the government.
In our “Charter of Demands”, submitted to the Government of India on 9th February, 2016 on behalf of Staff Side, National Council(JCM), we have categorically demanded that, the MACP should be treated as financial upgradation without any grading stipulation and the MACP should be provided on the basis of promotional cadre hierarchy of the concerned department. The Staff Side has demanded to reject the efficiency stipulation recommended by the 7th CPC. However, this issue was not discussed with the Staff Side, National Council(JCM) by the government before taking a decision on this significant issue as well as recommendation of the 7th CPC for withholding of annual increment in the case of those employees who are not able to meet the benchmark, either for MACP or a regular promotion within the first 20 years of their service.
You will appreciate that, in the government set-up it will be very difficult to assess the performance and talent of each and every employee since the government functions on a collective basis. Moreover, this decision of the government, if implemented, will result in favouritism and also victimization. This will also result in serious unrest at the workplace, which will affect the morale of the employees and will create division amongst the employees, which will ultimately reflect on the performance and productivity of each organization.
Therefore, we are of the firm opinion that, the government should reconsider their decision on the above issues and we request you to kindly withdraw the same and a discussion in this regard may be held with the Staff Side at the earliest.
With Kind Regards!
Sincerely yours,
(SHIVA GOPAL MISHRA)
Secretary(Staff Side)
Source : http://confederationhq.blogspot.in/
COMMENTS
Comrades, please, kindly ensure the following while negotiating with the Central Ministry:
1. In the 6th CPC, from PB1 to PB3 the fitment factor was 2.86 but for PB4 it was 3.24. So, in 7th CPC from PB1 to PB3 the fitment factor should be 3.71 (Min.Rs.26000/-) and PB4 it can be 2.81 as recommended by 7th CPC.
2. The difference between lowest and Highest paid Central Government Servants should not cross 1:10.
3. HRA, should be retained at 30%, 20%, 10% for X, Y,Z respectively. People living in Bombay Delhi and Bengaluru are most affected because of higher rental values and Government Quarters are not in sufficient numbers. However, fix the max. HRA ceiling as Rs.30000/-.
4. MACP – to be changed from Grade Pay hierarchy to Promotional hierarchy with effect from 1/9/2008. 5 MACP should be provided to those who are recruited in Group C post and 3 MACP for those who are recruited in Group A post. Most of the staff in Departments like Indian Railways are a suffering lot because of less avenues for promotion.
5. In future, Central Staff doesn’t want Pay Commission. In its place pay should be revised once in 5 years by merging the entire DA existing by then.
6. All Central Government Departments conducts Cadre Review for its staff within the time frame fixed by DoPT without fail.
7. Wherever, bunching of pay takes place in a Pay Matrix, the pay of staff who is drawing more pay but below the next stage in the level should be raised to next stage in the Level so that Senior doesn’t suffer vis-à-vis Junior.