DoPT has published status report of Cadre Review proposals as on October, 2007 :-

Status Report in respect of Cadre Review proposals
as on October, 2007

Sl. No.	Status	Remarks
1	Cadre Review completed during the last five years	Details in Annexure I
2	Cadre Review proposals not carried out/not received	Details in Annexure II
3.	Cadre Review proposals not received from CCAs	Details in Annexure III

Annexure I

CADRE REVIEW COMPLETED DURING THE LAST FIVE YEARS

Status as on October, 2007

Sl. No.	Name of the Service	Year of last cadre review
	Indian Railway Personnel Service	2007 (4th)
	Indian Postal Service	2006 (5th)
	Indian Information Service	2006 (3rd)
	Indian Civil Accounts Service	2005 (4th)
	Indian Railway Accounts Service	2005 (4th)
	Indian Railway Traffic Service	2005 (4th)
	Indian Railway Service of Engg.	2005 (4th)
	Indian Railway Medical Service	2005 (4th)
	Indian Economic Service	2005 (3rd)
	Indian Statistical Service	2005 (2nd)
	Indian Foreign Service	2004 (4th)
	Indian Railway of Signal & Tel. Engg.	2004 (4th)
	Indian Railway Stores Service	2004 (4th)
	Central Health Service	2004 (3rd)
	Defence Quality Assurance Service	2004 (3rd)
	Indian Cost Accounts Service	2004 (2nd)
	Indian Railway Service of Elec. Engg.	2003 (4th)
	Indian Railway Service of Mech. Engg.	2003 (4th)
	Central Labour Service	2003 (1st)
	Indian Defence Account Service	2002 (4th)
	Indian Custom & Central Excise Service	2002 (3rd)
	Railway Protection Force	2002 (3rd)

Annexure II

CADRE REVIEW HAS NOT BEEN CARRIED/PROPOSAL NOT RECEIVED.

Status as on October, 2007

Sl. No.	Name of the Service	Year of last cadre review
1.	Indian P&T Bldg. Works Service	1989
2.	Indian Telecommunication Service	1988
3.	Indian Broadcasting (Programme) Service	1984
4.	Indian Broadcasting (Engg.) Service	1981
5.	Indian P&T Accounts & Finance Service	No proposal received.
6.	Defence Research & Development Service	No proposal received.

Annexure III

CADRE REVIEW PROPOSALS NOT RECEIVED FROM CADRE CONTROLLING AUTHORITIES

Status as on October, 2007

Sl. No.	Name of the Service	Year of last cadre review
1.	Indian Revenue Service (IT)	2001
2.	Indo-Tibetan Border Police	2001
3.	Indian Trade Service	1998
4.	Defence Aeronautical Quality Assurance Service	1996
5.	Indian Defence Estates Service	1995
6.	Indian Ordnance Factory Health Service (COMO Cadre)	1995
7.	Indian Company Law Service	1995
8.	Central Reserve Police Health Service	1994
9.	ITBP Health Service	1994
10.	Central Water Engg. Service	1991
11.	Central Reserve Police Force	1991
12.	Indian Ordnance Factory Service	1990
13.	Central Power Engg. Service	1990
14.	Central Engg. Service (Roads)	1990
15.	Central Industrial Security Force	1990
16.	Indian Audit & Accounts Service	1989
17.	Border Security Force	1989
18.	Geological Survey of India	1989
19.	Indian Naval Armament Service	1987
20.	Indian Legal Service	1987
21.	Indian Meteorological Service	1987
22.	Survey of India Group ‘A’ Service	1985
23.	Border Security Force Health Service	1984

Source: http://persmin.gov.in/DOPT/CSWing/CRDivision/Cadre%20Review.htm

POINTS TO BE FOLLOWED BY THE CADRE CONTROLLING AUTHORITIES WHILE FORMULATING PROPOSALS FOR CADRE REVIEW OF GROUP ‘A’ SERVICES

1. The proposal for cadre review may be formulated in accordance with the guidelines and instructions issued by the Department of Personnel and Training and Department of Expenditure. If there are any deviations, full justification therefore may be given.

2. The proposal should begin with a brief background of the Service and the development which have taken place since last cadre review.

3. It should contain the requisite data in prescribed proforma.

4. All contents may be chapterised suitably.

5. The abbreviations used in the proposal may be clubbed alphabetically in a list at the end of the proposal.

6. Full justification may be given individually for each upgradation/creation of posts, especially those at S.A.G. and higher levels.

7. While sending cadre review proposals to Department of Personnel & Training, the Cadre Controlling Authorities may indicate precisely the functional requirements of various categories of posts and group them in terms of duties and responsibilities. This can be done by conducting a general job evaluation exercise, which would help in ensuring that different grades in a cadre reflect distinctly different level of functions and that higher posts do have higher level of duties and responsibilities.

8. The existing level of stagnation vis-à-vis that after the proposed cadre review may be brought out clearly.

9. Various kinds of reserves may be shown separately (Training, Deputation, Probation, and Leave).

10. The existing training facilities and proposed augmentation, if any, may be indicated.

11. The existing strength and proposed strength (grade/pay-scale wise) may be given in a tabular statement.

12. Different mode of recruitment/promotion to various grades may be indicated.

13. All Instructions of the Government concerning downsizing the Government are duly taken into account.

14. Confirmation to the effect that the proposal will not result in any increase in the overall strength of the cadre or in introduction of new scales / grades.

15. Matching savings may be provided from within the cadre and financial implications of the proposal (which should be budget neutral) should be amplified.

16. If the posts in the lowest grade are proposed to be abolished, its effect, if any, on the promotion prospects of the incumbents of the feeder posts may be indicated.

17. While forwarding the cadre review proposals of Group ‘A’ Services, it may be ensured that cadre review of feeder posts from Group ‘B’, ‘C’ and ‘D’ be completed beforehand, so as to reflect the impact of the same on the induction into Group ‘A’ Services, whenever the same is envisaged in the Statutory Rules.

18. The position of a pending SIU Report, if any, may be stated. The concerned Ministry/Department should give a certificate that there is no ongoing SIU study having a bearing on posts covered in the Cadre Review Proposals and that no recommendations of SIU study pertaining to the cadre are pending implementation.

19. The position regarding applicability or otherwise of NFSG instructions to the Service may be brought out.

20. The status of the recommendations of the Sixth Central Pay Commission, if any, about the Service, may be given.

21. A copy each of the latest Civil List of the Service and the latest Service Rules (Recruitment Rules) together with all amendments may be enclosed.

Source Link: http://www.persmin.nic.in/DOPT/CSWing/CRDivision/guidelines.htm

Other related DoPT’s Office Memorandum:

DoPT OM No. I-11011/1/2009-CRD dated 14-12-2010

Subject: Consolidated guidelines on cadre review of Central Group ‘A’ Services.

The undersigned is directed to say that provisions governing the process of cadre review of Central Group ‘A’ Services are contained in various Office Memoranda issued by the Department of Personnel and Training and the Department of Expenditure. [click here to read more]

Recent Circulars

File No.I-11012/3/2010-CRD, Dated 29th December, 2010

Recommendations of the Fifth Central Pay Commission on the scales of pay of posts pf Superintending Engineers and equivalent in the Organized Group ‘A’ Engineering Service.

File No.I-11019/12/2008-CRD, Dated 19th November, 2009

Attributes of Organised Group ‘A’ Central Services- Clarification regarding.

File No.I-11019/6/2008-CRD, Dated 5th September, 2008

Cadre Review in pursuance of the Government of India, Department of Expenditure Resolutions No. 1/1/2008-IC dated August 29, 2008- Acceptance of the recommendations of 6th CPC.

Stay connected with us via Facebook, Google+ or Email Subscription.

Subscribe to Central Government Employee News & Tools by Email [Click Here]
Follow us: Twitter [click here] | Facebook [click here] | Google+ [click here]
Admin

Status Report in respect of Cadre Review proposals as on October, 2007