Draft Model Cadre Review Proposal along with a check list of documents/information required- Dopt Orders
Subject: – Draft Model Cadre Review Proposal.
Information required for examination of the Cadre Review proposal:
a. Whether representatives of the service association(s) consulted.
b. Whether the proposal has been referred to Department of Personnel and Training with the due approval of the Integrated Finance Division and the Minister in charge.
c. A certificate to the effect that no court case is pending which will have bearing on the proposed cadre review.
d. Name of the contact officer(s) who can furnish additional information, if needed.
e. A copy of recruitment rules with latest amendments.
f. A copy of Civil list/seniority list.
g. Whether an attempt has been made in the proposal to encadre all the posts which have similar functions and responsibilities.
h. Any recommendation of Pay Commission or Parliamentary Committees or Audit Report or any other Expert Group on the Service may also be included.
i. As per instruction issued by the Department of Expenditure, the cadre review proposal should‘ not result in any increase in the number of posts.
j. information as per performa prescribed in the Monograph.
Model Cadre Review Proposal
NOTE FOR THE COMMITTEE OF SECRETARIES
Subject: Cadre Review of the “Solar Family Exploration Service” under the Ministry of Planetary Affairs.
1. Introduction & Background
Grade | Inception | 1st Cadre Review | 2nd Cadre Review | ………….. | Any other major increase |
Year | Year | Year | ………….. | Year | |
Apex | |||||
HAG+ | |||||
HAG | |||||
SAG | |||||
JAG | |||||
STS | |||||
JTS | |||||
Total |
1.3 Functions & Responsibilities of the Service.
(This should include the work allocation of the service)
The distribution of posts in different offices (grade wise) is as follows
HAG | SAG | JAG | STS | JTS | Total | |
Ministry Headquarters/Board | ||||||
D/O Moon Mission | ||||||
D/o Mars Mission | ||||||
D/o Venus Mission | ||||||
D/o Saturn Mission | ||||||
PMO | ||||||
ISRO | ||||||
Other Ministries | ||||||
Field offices | ||||||
Total |
The present Organizational Structure in the Field formation) is as follows:-
a. The main reason leading to the decision of cadre review along with supporting information.
b. Change in the mandate of the organization and role of the service in future.
c. Business process reengineering redistribution of posts and responsibilities.
d. increase in volume of work.
e. Impact of computerisation and outsourcing of certain works hitherto being undertaken in the Department.
f. Impact of creation of public sector units for work which were originally being performed by this service
2.1 Justification for increase/decrease in posts at different levels.
(i)Apex Level- At present there is no post at this level. lt is proposed to create/upgrade ____posts at this level to look after the work of ______ (functional justification). In case the proposal is accepted officers of the _____ batch will be covered.
(ii) HAG + Level
(iii) HAG Level
(iv) SAG Level L
(v) JAG/NFSG
(vi) STS Level
(vii) JTS Level
(viii) Reserve
(The Batches to be covered in each grade after the proposed cadre review should also be indicated.)
2.2 Changes in the Organizational Structure after the proposed Cadre Review.
HAG | SAG | JAG | STS | JTS | Total | |
Ministry Headquarters/Board | ||||||
D/O Moon Mission | ||||||
D/o Mars Mission | ||||||
D/o Venus Mission | ||||||
D/o Saturn Mission | ||||||
PMO | ||||||
ISRO | ||||||
Other Ministries | ||||||
Field offices | ||||||
Total |
HAG | SAG | JAG | STS | JTS | Total | |
Ministry Headquarters/Board | ||||||
D/O Moon Mission | ||||||
D/o Mars Mission | ||||||
D/o Venus Mission | ||||||
D/o Saturn Mission | ||||||
PMO | ||||||
ISRO | ||||||
Other Ministries | ||||||
Field offices | ||||||
Total |
Table 4-~ Structure of cadre proposed by the Ministry of Planetary Affairs.
Sl. No. | Grade | Existing Strength | Proposed Strength | % of SDP | ||
Normative | Existing | Proposed | ||||
(i) | Apex | 3 | ||||
(ii) | HAG+ | |||||
(iii) | HAG | |||||
(iv) | SAG | 17 | ||||
(v) | JAG/NFSG | 50 | ||||
(vi) | STS | 50 | ||||
SDP | ||||||
(vii) | JTS | |||||
(viii) | Reserve | |||||
Total Strength |
3 Financial implications/Financial Neutrality
4. Recruitment Planning
The cadre review proposal should ensure that planned recruitment should be done by the Department taking into account maintenance and growth needs of the cadre and promotional prospects for the holders of the cadre posts.
4.1 Year wise recruitment position:
Year of Recruitment | Number of Vacancies for Direct Recruitment | Number of persons actually appointed | Number of vacancies to be filled by promotion | Number of officers actually promoted |
4.2 Year wise recruitment planning: The detailed recruitment planning for the next five years may be shown.
Year | Number of Vacancies for Direct Recruitment | Number of vacancies to be filled by promotion |
5 Vacancy position: The details of incumbency position are as under:
Grade | Authorized Sanctioned strength | Actual Strength (No. of officers holding) | Last Promoted Officer’s Batch | |||
Cadre post | Ex-cadre posts | Deputation/Leave/Training | Total | |||
Apex | ||||||
HAG+ | ||||||
HAG | ||||||
SAG | ||||||
JAG | ||||||
STS | ||||||
JTS | ||||||
Total |
(In case of vacancy, the steps to mitigate the vacancy level may also be indicated)
6 Batch wise strength
S.No. | Batch (Year) | Direct Recruits | Promotee | Total |
7 Proposal for approval
Approval of Committee of Secretaries is solicited for the cadre review proposal of the Solar Family Exploration Service as summarised below:
The following changes in the Cadre structure
i. Creation/abolition of _____ posts at HAG Level
ii. Increase/decrease of _____ posts at SAG Level
iii. Reduction/enhancement of _____ posts at JAG Level
iv. Reduction/enhancement of _____ posts at STS Level and
v. Reduction/enhancement of _____ posts at JTS Level
The recommendation made above can be summarized as below
a)
b)
c)
The structure after changes, if accepted, will be as follows.
S.No. | Grade | Existing Strength | Proposed Strength |
(i) | Apex Scale | ||
(ii) | HAG | ||
(iii) | SAG | ||
(iv) | JAG | ||
(v) | STS | ||
SDP | |||
(vi) | JTS | ||
(vii) | Reserve | ||
Total Strength |
This has the approval of Integrated Finance Division and Minister Incharge.
Source: http://documents.doptcirculars.nic.in/D2/D02adm/draft.pdf
Stay connected with us via Facebook, Google+ or Email Subscription.
Subscribe to Central Government Employee News & Tools by Email [Click Here]
Follow us: Twitter [click here] | Facebook [click here] | Google+ [click here]
Admin
COMMENTS